By Jamie Martin
A panel under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) ruled in favor of the US in a dispute over Mexico’s ban on genetically modified (GM) corn.
The decision, announced on December 20, found that Mexico’s 2023 presidential decree banning GM corn and glyphosate was not based on sufficient scientific evidence or international standards.
Mexico argued that the ban protects public health and the nation’s biodiversity, citing the importance of corn as a staple food and cultural identity.
The campaign "Sin Maíz, No Hay País" criticized the panel, claiming it lacked legitimacy to evaluate the health and environmental risks of GM corn. “Under no circumstances can a trade agreement be above Mexico’s sovereignty,” the campaign asserted.
The decree aims to ban GM corn for human consumption and reduce its presence in livestock feed, gradually transitioning to sustainable practices. The panel found the decree violated USMCA rules, stating it was not supported by adequate risk assessments.
The US maintains that Mexico’s actions hinder free trade, arguing that GM corn imports support a $5 billion market.
Mexico offered to conduct a joint risk assessment with the US, but the offer was declined. Critics highlight that US evidence relied on industry-funded studies, while Mexico presented peer-reviewed research.
Corn contamination in Mexico remains a concern. Studies show a rise in genetically modified sequences in native corn varieties, threatening biodiversity. Advocacy groups urge stricter biosafety measures to protect traditional farming practices.
Despite the ruling, Mexico continues to advocate for precautionary measures against GM corn, emphasizing the risks to health, biodiversity, and cultural heritage.
Photo Credit: gettyimages-dsz
Categories: National